Page 44 - The Road from Babylon to Zion
P. 44

it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by the bondwoman and one
                       by the free woman. But the son by the bondwoman was born according to
                       the flesh, and the son by the free woman through the promise. This is
                       allegorically speaking, for these women are two covenants: one proceeding
                       from Mount Sinai bearing children who are to be slaves; she is Hagar. Now
                       this  Hagar  is  Mount  Sinai  in  Arabia  and  corresponds  to  the  present
                       Jerusalem, for she is in slavery with her children.


               Those  who  want  to  be  under  law,  who  want  to  be  Torah  Observant,  remove
               themselves from a place of standing in faith to receive the promises of God and they
               embrace bondage and slavery as they try to keep the Law through the power of the
               flesh. What was given at Sinai? Was it not the Law? Do not say that this was the
               ceremonial or sacrificial Law only, for it was the moral Law that Moses brought down
               from the mountain on tablets of stone. Is not this covenant related to Hagar, slavery
               and the flesh? Do the saints really need to go back to this?

               The children of faith are equated to Isaac and to being the true offspring of Abraham.
               Abraham never tried to keep the Law or be Torah Observant for the Law was given
               430 years after Abraham. Why then would the saints today want to place themselves
               under the Law?


               Many argue that it was just the sacrificial law that was done away with, and some
               scriptures mention specifically this portion of the Law having been fulfilled and
               having passed away (Hebrews 10:1-9). However, Paul states that it is not just the
               ceremonial or sacrificial aspects of the Law of which he is speaking.


               The Law was used of God to reveal righteousness and in many places it demanded
               that the observant Jew should separate themselves from that which would defile
               them and that which was unclean. This was the portion of the Law that Peter and
               James and Barnabas stumbled over. The Law said which foods were clean and which
               were unclean. The Law said which type of people were clean and which were unclean.
               These apostles began to separate themselves from the Gentile believers over matters
               of the Law and Paul boldly confronted them over their hypocrisy.


                       Galatians 2:14-19
                       But when I saw that they were not straightforward about the truth of
                       the gospel, I said to Cephas in the presence of all, "If you, being a Jew,
                       live like the Gentiles and not like the Jews, how is it that you compel the
                       Gentiles to live like Jews? We are Jews by nature and not sinners from
                       among the Gentiles;  nevertheless knowing that a man is not justified
                       by the works of the Law but through faith in Yahshua the Messiah, even
                       we have believed in Yahshua the Messiah, so that we may be justified
                       by faith in Messiah and not by the works of the Law; since by the works
   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49