Page 142 - Lunacy and the Age of Deception
P. 142

Consider what effect this brilliant sunlight would have on film. Without a filter, film would be
               rapidly saturated with light and appear washed out. With a filter, the extreme difference between
               light and shadow on the Moon would cause shadows to appear impenetrable when the camera was
               properly adjusted to photograph objects under intense sunlight. It was this very line of reasoning
               which NASA used to explain why no stars appear in the lunar sky. They say the cameras were set-up
               for daytime photography, so dimly illuminated objects, such as stars in the sky, did not show up at
               all. The entire sky appeared as a solid black expanse. If this is true, then the same thing would also
               occur when the astronauts were taking photos of shadowed objects on the surface of the Moon.
               Objects illuminated directly by the Sun should appear visible, while everything in shadow should
               be dark, indistinct, and lacking detail.

               The contrast between illuminated and shaded areas on the Moon is much greater than light and
               shadow on Earth, and it should appear this way in photos. NASA, after all, did not use any specialty
               film which would allow for a wider range of light exposures such as one would find on the Moon.
               They used the same Kodak Ektachrome film sold to photographers for use on Earth.

               If we were to step into the shade of a building on a sunny day on Earth, there would be a noticeable
               decrease in light, but we could still see detail quite well. However, on the Moon, if you did the same
               thing it would be like stepping into the darkness of night. There is therefore no plausible reason that
               the front of Buzz Aldrin’s spacesuit should be so visible, and the detail so clear. The Sun in all its
               lunar brilliance is at his back, and the front of his spacesuit is in shadow. We should be able to
               discern no detail on the shadowed side of Buzz Aldrin. He should appear as a silhouette against a
               bright backdrop.



















               Silhouette

               Without  any  front  lighting  source,  and  lacking  the  light  scattering  properties  of  the  Earth’s
               atmosphere, all  objects lying  in  shadow on  the Moon  should  appear dark. NASA  admits  this
               themselves. On one of their websites the following statements are found.


               Without the blue sky, your shadow would be eerily dark, like a piece of night following you around.
               Weird. Yet that's exactly how it is on the Moon.


               To visualize the experience of Apollo astronauts, imagine the sky turning completely and utterly
               black while the sun continues to glare. Your silhouette darkens, telling you "you're not on Earth
               anymore."
   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147