Page 62 - Laying Down the Law
P. 62

My Servant Moses


                 have found that by studying the parabolic nature of the lives of Old Testament
              Ifigures, much insight can be gained concerning matters that are shrouded in a fog
              of confusion. In the previous chapter we looked at the life of Hagar. Who would have
              known  that  the  two  wives  of  Abraham  were  intended  by  Yahweh  to  serve  as
              testimonies of two covenants that have been made with His people? If the apostle
              Paul had not declared this to be so, certainly the matter would have been hidden from
              the eyes of most Christians.
                    Let us pause and consider Hagar for one more moment before passing on to
              Moses. Knowing that Yahweh hates divorce, and that He is a covenant keeping God,
              does not the sending away of Hagar cause one’s attention to be arrested? Why would
              Yahweh sanction divorce in this case, for truly this is what occurred. Though Hagar
              was not given a writ of divorce (these were not used until 430 years later when the
              Law was given) her husband rejected her, casting out the bondwoman and her son.
                    Such an act appears unjust to those who do not perceive the spiritual pattern
              being portrayed. How would Hagar and her son survive? All they were sent away with
              was some bread and water. They had a wilderness to cross on foot. Does not such an
              act by Abraham smack of treachery? Indeed, it would have been an unrighteous act
              had he arrived at this course by the counsel of his own soul. However, it was Yahweh
              who told Abraham to send away the bondwoman and her son.
                    Many Christians today view the casting away of the covenant of Law as an act of
              treachery. It is hard for the natural mind to justify such an action. The Law has been
              the constant companion of the people of God since the days of Moses. It has born fruit
              according to its ability. The people of God entered into covenant with the Law. How
              can it be right to cast it away with as apparent little regard as Abraham manifested in
              sending forth Hagar? Although many cannot justify such a course of action in their
              minds, the Scriptures reveal it to be the will of God.


                      Galatians 4:24, 30
                      For these are the two covenants: the one from Mount Sinai which gives birth
                      to bondage, which is Hagar... Nevertheless what does the Scripture say? "Cast
                      out the bondwoman and her son, for the son of the bondwoman shall not be
                      heir with the son of the freewoman."


                    What is spoken here is very plain. The Law entered into by covenant at Mount
              Sinai must be cast out. Surely this offends the mind of man as much today as it would
              have for modern Christians to observe Abraham turning Hagar and Ishmael out of his
              tents. Would not any person of moral conscience chide Abraham for such an act?
              Apart  from  hearing  Yahweh  declare  this  to  be  His  will,  Abraham  would  stand
              condemned by those who witnessed his actions.
                    This is the way of things to this very hour. Those who have not discerned the
              mind of Yahweh in this matter are greatly troubled, even offended, at the thought of
   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67