Page 187 - Foundations
P. 187

Having read Frances Rolleston’s own accounts of her struggles to arrive at the meaning of names, and
               having reservations in my own mind about her belief that Hebrew was the pre-Babel language of all
               mankind, I am very much open to questioning the names and meanings that Frances Rolleston has
               supplied for individual stars and the constellations.

               Miss Rolleston held an unorthodox view on languages. It is apparent from the biographical work
               produced by Caroline Dent that Miss Rolleston had an exceptional grasp of a large number of ancient
               languages, but this fact does not automatically suggest that her views on the origin and transmission
               of languages was correct. Miss Rolleston’s views are set forth in her book.

               The names are here explained on the supposition that the first language was given by the Creator to
               the first man, conveying ideas to the mind by sounds, as impressions of form and colour are conveyed
               by sight. In all languages these sounds are traceable, conveying the same ideas. In the dialects of the
               most  ancient  and  earliest  civilized  nations  they  are  the  most  recognizable:  in  those  the  most
               barbarous the most obscured. This primitive language appears to have been spoken by Noah, from
               the names given by him to his sons. In the confusion of the lip at Babel, pronunciation, and not
               words or roots, were altered. This may be inferred from the presence of the Hebrew roots in the
               dialects of all nations.
               [Source: Mazzaroth, Frances Rolleston]


               It is possible that the first language of man linked specific thoughts to corresponding sounds. In this
               sense, there would be an alphabet of sounds, each of which could be combined with other sounds to
               express the thoughts within a person’s mind. Some years ago I came across the teaching of Jeff A.
               Benner on the origins of the Paleo-Hebrew alphabet. Mr Benner, quite correctly I believe, suggested
               that each letter of the most ancient Hebrew alphabet, referred to as Paleo-Hebrew, was in fact a
               pictogram. That is, each letter was drawn as an image of something commonly recognizable to those
               who used this language. For example, the first letter of the Hebrew alphabet, corresponding to the
               English letter “A” is the Aleph. It is depicted as the head of an ox.









               Aleph

               The graphic above indicates how this letter’s representation has changed over the centuries. There is
               a  noticeable  similarity  between  the  “Early”  Paleo-Hebrew  character  and  the  “Middle”  period
               character.  However,  when  Israel  went  into  Babylonian  captivity  they  adopted  the  Babylonian
               alphabetic characters which are closer to the square script used in the Hebrew language today.

               Jeff Benner has shown that each of the characters of the Hebrew alphabet (Aleph-Bet) were originally
               pictograms. You can see the entire list at the following link.

               http://www.ancient-hebrew.org/28_chart.html
   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192