Page 134 - Foundations
P. 134

Moreover, it took place while she was giving birth, one put out a hand, and the midwife took and tied
               a scarlet thread on his hand, saying, “This one came out first.” But it came about as he drew back his
               hand, that behold, his brother came out. Then she said, “What a breach you have made for yourself!”
               So he was named Perez. And afterward his brother came out who had the scarlet thread on his hand;
               and he was named Zerah.


               The only argument given in favor of Cain and Abel being twins is that the Bible does not explicitly
               say they were not. This is an argument from silence, and it is extremely weak. The silence itself
               speaks against the fact that they were twins, for twin sons have garnered much comment in the pages
               of the Scriptures. This is a fact that the apostles of the New Testament have not overlooked.


               Romans 9:10-13
               And not only this, but there was Rebekah also, when she had conceived twins by one man, our father
               Isaac; for though the twins were not yet born, and had not done anything good or bad, in order that
               God's purpose according to His choice might stand, not because of works, but because of Him who
               calls, it was said to her, “The older will serve the younger.” Just as it is written, “Jacob I loved, but
               Esau I hated.”

               Surely, if Eve had given birth to twin sons, and they had different fathers, one of whom was Satan,
               there would be abundant testimony in both the Old and New Testaments to corroborate this fact. Yet
               there is not a word.

               Scriptures that Stand Against the Serpent Seed Doctrine


















               Let me move on to address a number of Scriptures that argue against the claims of the serpent seed
               doctrine. A key passage is found in Paul’s discourse to the Romans about the origins of sin. Paul
               argues that all mankind were made sinners through the transgression of the one man Adam. Because
               all humanity was in Adam’s loins as his seed when he sinned, all men were made sinners. This
               apostolic argument is null and void if Eve gave birth to two lines of men that arose from two distinct
               paternal lines. Instead of all being made sinners by the one man Adam, the argument would have to
               be stated that all were made sinners through Adam and the serpent/Satan. This, however, is NOT what
               the apostle wrote.


               Romans 5:12
               Through one man sin entered into the world...
   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139